Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Thanks Sinbad.

Thank you Sinbad for coming forward with the truth about what happened in Bosnia. So it turns out there was no snipers. So where is the outrage? Last week Obama was judged on the words of his pastor yet this week Hillary is not being judged on the words that came out of her very own mouth. If Hillary can lie about this, what else is she capable of lying about? It's not the lie that bothers me as much as the way she brushes this off.

So it turns out that those pledged delegates are not necessarily pledged. A delegate can change his or her mind at the time of the convention. Am I the only one who thinks that this system is a tad bit flawed? So am I to assume that Hillary’s plan is to plant the seed of dissent in the hearts of the Obama delegates? Is it just me or does Hillary Clinton wants to win this nomination at all costs even if it means that she destroys the party in the process?

I’m full of questions today. Have ya noticed?

Ya know how people were complementing the grace Hillary showed last week when she kept her mouth shut about Rev. Wright? Well I guess that’s over. “You know, you don’t choose your family, but you choose what church you want to attend.” Very sly Mrs. Clinton, very sly indeed.

That’s a very interesting statement. Because if Hillary had a choice do you think she would want Hugh and Tony Rodham for brothers? For those of you who have not taken the time to dig up the dirt on these two please allow me to brief you. Apparently Hugh Rodham received around four hundred thousand dollars for legal services regarding gaining the Presidential pardon of fraudulent businessman Glenn Braswell and the sentence commutation of drug trafficker Carlos Vignali. Vignali was sentenced to fifteen years for shipping cocaine to Minnesota. Tony Rodham in 2002 was in disputes with his former wife over child support payments, with Nicole Boxer saying he had not paid them in six months.

So I can understand why Hillary would say that you can’t choose your family. After reading Carl Bernstein’s article about Hillary’s inability to be open and honest, I’ve come to a conclusion.

Hillary Clinton has a problem being candid. She was ok with Florida and Michigan’s delegates not being seated when she thought she had the nomination wrapped up, but was quick to change her tune when she realized it wasn’t going to be handed to her. But the thing that bothers me the most about her is that she is completely blind to the fact that she is acting like she’s entitled to this nomination. And what bothers me more than that are her supporters who believe she deserves this, as if to say it is her turn. That’s where my problem lies. This is not something that you can just hand to a person. Can someone tell me why she deserves to be president?

Before I go I want to leave y’all with this, when a black man cheats on his wife the best gift he can give her is an 8 carat purple diamond ring, but when a white man cheats on his wife the best gift he can give her is a seat in the US Senate and possibly the Presidency.

No comments: